Differences between LMS and LSS
The difference between Lean Management System (LMS) and Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is based on what each tool represents. LMS focuses on the analysis of the workflow that aims to reduce cycle time and eliminate waste. This tool strives to maximize value to customers by using the available resources in the best way possible (Alobaidy, 2020). The other tool, LSS, is concerned about the perfection of performance that desires to lower costs and realize higher customer satisfaction levels.
Benefits of the Two Models
The benefits of LMS include lowering the cost for most companies’ operational efficiency. The tool maximizes profits in the best way possible, and companies do more to control the cost in terms of price, quality of the product, and market penetration. The other benefit for LMS is that it improves the relationship quality between the business and prospects because customer interaction is maintained on high satisfaction levels (Leon et al., 2017). LMS is utilized to enhance the customer’s value by effectively and appropriately using the company’s resources.
LSS helps in nurturing leadership for managers because it involves a thorough understanding of financial services’ measurements and quality. Additionally, the use of LSS helps improve customer satisfaction because of the concrete analysis of the change in consumer buying behavior (Nabiyouni & Franchetti, 2019). It helps in standardization because there is no specific authorization that manages Lean Six Sigma certification procedures.
How LSS and LMS Streamline Processes in Healthcare
Use of Lean Management System and Lean Six Sigma in hospitals targets shortening waiting time in health institutions as some patients may be having severe problems that need quick attention. The other reason why Six sigma is helpful in hospitals is to prevent injuries and falls while carrying out nursing practices (Alobaidy, 2020). LMS and LSS help healthcare as they reduce medication mistakes in prescription and administration of drugs. Hospitals have applied Six sigma to reduce unnecessary expenses by using the DMAIC method.
The healthcare workers develop a framework that details steps such as updating medical records, checking insurance covers, and collecting co-pays. Medical practitioners with Lean Sigma certifications are essential in health institutions because they provide advanced tools. For example, directors of quality can use LMS to control and monitor a new procedure’s effectiveness over a given duration (Nabiyouni & Franchetti, 2019).
How LSS and LMS Influence Budget Allocation in Hospitals
Lean Management System and Lean Six Sigma influence health institutions to allocate budget in various ways. The application of Six Sigma principles can help healthcare professionals forecast the relative change in service delivery (Alobaidy, 2020). Therefore, they will examine the loopholes making medical care have constraints. The budget is set to streamline all the processes that have been neglected in the overall health practicing in the hospitals
How Financial Considerations in Healthcare Relate to LMS and LSS
Healthcare organizations’ financial considerations relate to the two strategies in improving and sustaining quality healthcare because they aim at patient satisfaction and lowering of costs of operations (Alobaidy, 2020). For instance, if the hospital has noticed that the automated equipment is consuming many resources compared to the human workforce, the management can change from mechanical to human-based involvement.
Relationship between LMS, LSS and Quality Healthcare
LSS and LMS are related to continuous quality improvement because they enable health institutions management to capture variation in the running efficiency. When the management notices a decline in the quality of healthcare services, they can use LMS to get a candid framework for improving processes that guarantees the sustainability of quality healthcare (Alobaidy, 2020). The models encourage health institutions to continue offering quality healthcare by eliminating defects in processes, streamlining the medical care procedures, and lowering unnecessary costs to the hospital’s financial operations (Leon et al., 2017). The two models are recommended to be used in private and public healthcare institutions because they make services linear and implement quality services in later organizations.
References
Alobaidy, D. (2020). The influence of lean Six Sigma tools in reducing the cost of quality and fulfilling firms’ competitive advantage. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(03), 521–541.
Leon, C. M. H., del Carmen Temblador Perez, M., Farris, J., & Beruvides, M. (2017). Integrating Six Sigma tools using team‐learning processes. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 133–156.
Nabiyouni, N., & Franchetti, M. (2019). Applying Lean Six Sigma methods to improve infectious waste management in hospitals. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 11(1), 1.