Abstract
This paper draws on set assessment exercises to create an action plan to improve CSR initiatives in the aviation industry. The action plan suggests possible strategies that airlines could implement to promote the realization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The action plan draws on personal experiences accrued in the airline industry regarding key operational challenges affecting the sector and academic literature borrowed from course materials that explain the importance of ethical business. At the center of these discussions is the need to embrace sustainability as a core principle guiding future process designs in the aviation sector.
Evidence will be provided to show how changing supply chain networks, promoting ethical leadership, and digitization can help airlines to align their goals with the aforementioned SDGs. The findings apply to airlines and employees working in the broader aviation industry. They are intended to better equip them with the tools needed to navigate the challenges of operating in an uncertain business environment.
Introduction
The contemporary business environment is characterized by several problems, including climate change, resource depletion, and sustainability. Relative to these challenges, Blowfield (2013) notes that many new businesses are trying to solve some of these issues while existing ones are changing their business processes to comply with the changing business environment (Blowfield, 2013). Organizations in the aviation industry fall in the latter category because they are struggling to cope with new threats and challenges as they conform to an uncertain and volatile market that is influenced by changing consumer preferences, the rising cost of operations, increased travel restrictions, among other factors.
Despite the existence of these challenges, the aviation industry is one of the most important sectors of the global economy. It contributes about $691 billion in global Gross domestic product (GDP) annually, making it among the most impactful sectors of the world economy (ATAG, 2020). Being an employee in the sector, I have noted the challenges affecting the industry and acquired immense experience, as a basis to develop this action plan. It is intended to support the realization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 (no poverty), 12 (responsible production and consumption), 13 (climate action), 15 (Life on Land), 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), and 17 (partnerships and collaboration). Therefore, strategies that will be proposed in the action plan are based on academic insight and professional experience.
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Realizing SDG 16, which focuses on peace, justice and developing strong institutions is predicted on the implementation of good leadership practices. Part of the discussions surrounding the role of leadership in organizational development has been centered on the quest for ethical leadership. The concept of good business ethics emerges in this review as a model for assessing the effectiveness of leadership practices in fulfilling organizational goals (Des Jardins and McCall, 1996). Lashley (2016) describes ethical leadership as a framework for evaluating management effectiveness and sustainability practices in an organization. Related to this exercise, Lashley (2016) suggests a four-part model for evaluating leadership practices based on whether they are “good” or “bad” vs. “legal” or “illegal.”
The value-based evaluation approach has also been used as a basis for evaluating leadership practices. This framework is based on the works of Williams and Preston (2018) who emphasize the need for managers to reflect on their values and understand how they affect those of managers and other groups of employees. This approach is linked to the Schwartz value system, mentioned in the course materials, which suggests that leadership values affect the impact of CSR activities. The situational leadership theory, as described by Blowfield (2013), may be used as another basis for reviewing leadership practices because it uses variables in a business’s internal and external environments to determine which leadership style is best suited for an organization.
The type of leadership style adopted in an organization should align with its corporate culture to create a supportive environment for developing strong institutions. A company’s corporate culture refers to a set of rules, norms, values, and practices that often stem from the top leadership and permeate throughout all other groups of employees in an organization. Thus, the corporate culture of an organization could strengthen the foundation for whoever comes into leadership.
This statement is linked with the works of Hartman, DesJardins and MacDonald (2014), which suggests that corporate culture affects leadership quality through ethical decision-making. Furthermore, due to the emphasis on virtues as a desirable quality of ethical leadership, DesJardins and MacDonald (2014) adds that corporate culture provides a framework that organizations can adopt to improve their leadership practices. Benn and Dunphy (2007) who advocate for a compliance-based leadership model support their views. Nonetheless, the leadership framework to be adopted and accepted in an organization depends on its unique internal and external market dynamics.
SDG 15 Life on Land
SDG 15 is aimed at promoting the sustainable use of resources on land and it complements planetary goals to promote sustainability. In this regard, there is need to include all stakeholders to realize these objectives. Mitchel’s stakeholder model, as described in the course materials provides a basis for analyzing the responsibility of all stakeholders towards the realization of the above-mentioned objectives.
The current model reflects the traditional view of evaluating stakeholders, which is defined by the power they wield over an organization. However, it is not a holistic measure of understanding stakeholder interests because it excludes subjective values of engagement affecting people and the planet. For example, the model fails to capture the injustices of human trafficking and the use of child labor in international business, in which the airline industry is a participant.
Evidence of these claims can be found in the works of Osobajo and Moore (2017), which has documented injustices meted against communities in the oil-rich Niger Delta region by giant multinationals. The authors claim that the primary stakeholders in the oil drilling business are the government of Nigeria and oil-producing corporations. Secondary stakeholders include non-governmental organizations and subgroups of local communities that live in the region. This classification model helps to understand who has the highest culpability in destroying natural ecosystems. Therefore, it can be used to identify primary and secondary stakeholders affecting an industry, thereby providing a basis for developing different strategies for addressing their needs.
Given that one organization cannot effectively address planetary concerns, it is important for all stakeholders to be consulted when developing sustainable management policies. Hunt and Watkiss (2011) conducted a study in the construction industry to evaluate how climate change influences the adaptation of cities to their built environment highlighted the need for early stakeholder engagement to realize sustainable development goals. Based on findings of assessments completed in London and New York, the authors found that early stakeholder engagement helped to better adapt the city to biodiversity challenges (Hunt and Watkiss, 2011).
The researchers also demonstrated that early stakeholder engagement helped to establish strong communication protocols that were pivotal in enhancing coordination among different interest groups in the industry (Hunt and Watkiss, 2011). This example shows that timeliness and tact are important strategies that can be adopted to promote a holistic understanding of sustainable development goals.
SDG 13 Climate Action
The importance of addressing climate change as part of the plan to realize SDG 13 serves two functions for organizations in the aviation industry. First, it helps them to adapt to some of the pressing challenges associated with climate change. Secondly, it encourages organizations to join the fight for the minimization of climate change effects by embracing sustainable practices. The overall goal of this plan is to make the organization more resilient to the effects of climate change and better protect communities from poverty by expanding employment opportunities through the adoption of “green” practices (Howard-Grenville et al., 2014). For example, it could lead to the inclusion of sustainability as a key area of policy concern affecting all policy decisions to be formulated or implemented in the organization.
Climate change concerns are often addressed at an organizational level by evaluating the type of operation they follow. Traditionally, most firms use the linear model, which is based on the assumption that resources are infinite – in reality, they are finite. This model has led to an increased imbalance between profit and costs through the creation of a resource-constrained economy, where materials become increasingly expensive as they are depleted (Howard-Grenville et al., 2014).
National isolationism has also emerged from this trend as countries become protective of their resources and energy reserves as they dwindle through copious consumption. This pattern could negatively affect the future of multinational firms because they undertake international travel operations, which are vulnerable to border closures and high levels of bureaucracy that may impede efficiency.
To address the challenges highlighted above, organizations have tried to build internal resiliency by undertaking fundamental reforms that have already been instituted to provide a strong foundation for developing future measures of addressing climate change. This action is linked to some of the suggestions highlighted by Howard-Grenville et al. (2014), which emphasize the need for organizations to build resilience to manage emerging social and economic challenges. It is predicted that doing so would make firms more adaptive to operating in a business environment characterized by uncertainty.
SDG 12 Responsible Production and Consumption
Strategies aimed at realizing SDG 12, which is focused on promoting responsible production and consumption have been premised on the need to increase resource efficiency. For example, Carpenter and Dunung (2012) proposed multilateral netting as a model for promoting resource efficiency in cross-border payments for multinational corporations. The model is designed to minimize taxes and the burden of cross-border payments when transactions involve companies operating in different parts of the world.
The need for effective collaboration has also been proposed as an alternative strategy and it has yielded positive results in some fields, such as the education sector, where the collaboration of UNICEF and IKEA in India, enabled educators to reach more than 74 million children through the promotion of education rights (UNICEF, 2020). These examples demonstrate that organizations can achieve responsible production and consumption through resource efficiency
Part of the discussions that are focused on promoting responsible production and consumption are centered on understanding tenets of organizational processes that lead to this outcome. For example, Richter and Arndt (2018), suggests that there is a difference between “product” and “process” legitimacy, as sought by organizations through their CSR initiatives. The authors analyzed British American Tobacco (BAT) as a case study to demonstrate how the company sought process legitimacy, which was referred to as “legitimacy approval” and a fundamental approach to meeting CSR goals. The BAT case study highlights how a company that sells “controversial” products, such as cigarettes, can seek legitimacy in a society that is abhors smoking.
Responsible production and consumption patterns could also be enriched through the development of ethical supply chains, as proposed by Aschendbrand, Proctor and Trebilcock (2018). The plan is based on the need to digitize supply chain systems to increase efficiency and enable companies to use them as a differentiating factor for redesigning supply chain initiatives.
Freise and Seuring (2015) have supported similar proposals in the clothing industry by providing evidence, which indicates that the transformation of supply chain networks has yielded positive results in the management of environmental and social risks of production (Freise and Seuring, 2015). Therefore, developing ethical supply chains could provide a reliable basis for promoting responsible production and consumption. Overall, these proposals contribute to the efficient use of resources, thereby providing a basis for supporting responsible production.
SDG 1 No Poverty
Improving employee welfare supports SDG 1, which is focused on the elimination of poverty. Poverty is largely a leadership problem that can be addressed by understanding the link between human rights, bad governance, and the failure of the international community to sanction corporations promoting activities that support poverty. Jameson, Song and Pecht (2016) have explained the complexity of this relationship when they evaluated the link between human rights abuses and the economic exploitation of minerals in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
Its resources notwithstanding, the exploitation of minerals has fueled decades of war and human rights abuses from militia groups that fund the chaos through the profits they get from organizations that buy their resources (Amnesty International and Afrewatch, 2020). In turn, they use these resources to finance local wars, thereby undermining the economic development of the country and the wellbeing of its citizens.
The international community has a role to play in preventing corporations from being part of the problem because their actions form a key link in the creation of poverty. Using the DRC case as an example, it can impose sanctions or “put pressure” on organizations not to trade with the militia groups to prevent the flow of funds used to finance the above-mentioned abuses (Jolly, 2020).
This strategy would be the first basis for instituting change in society because a withdrawal of funding could inevitably mean that the militias lack the financial resources to support human rights abuses that eventually lead to unemployment and poverty (Jameson, Song and Pecht, 2016). This example highlights the role that ineffective leadership at the local, state or international level could play in undermining people’s wellbeing.
At an organization level, managers need to play a pivotal role in protecting the interests of their workers because they must provide them with the right environment to work productively and safely. This goal is based on the concept of donut economics, which suggests that a larger social welfare plan needs to be established above the wider scope of interests affecting profitability to lift people out of poverty. If the donut model were applied to the aviation sector, it would mean that there would be a significant increase in the contribution of workers to decision-making processes. In other words, it would prioritize the interest of employees in the management’s decision-making process.
SDG 17 Partnerships for Sustainable Development
The need for collaboration and partnerships in international business aims to advance the concept of “people,” which is interconnected with profits and planets. Several models of management, such as the triple bottom line approach, which is borrowed from course materials, emphasizes the need to address people, planet, and profit concerns, as an interlinked network of factors affecting sustainability goals. People help to explain the interrelationship in ideas that would eventually lead to the realization of SDG 17 (Stott and Murphy, 2020).
Stemming from its importance in meeting organizational goals, managers are encouraged to seek strategic partnerships with stakeholders who share the same vision and promote collaborative exercises that support sustainable development (Stott and Murphy, 2020). This goal could be achieved by transforming corporate governance practices to reflect sustainability as a precondition for signing partnership agreements.
Different industries have sought varied types of collaborative frameworks to promote sustainable development. For example, in the aviation sector, operational efficiency has been maximized when airlines share maintenance equipment, expertise, and leverage on economies of scale. Over time, they have been built on a history of shared systems, open communication, and a common vision among partners.
Therefore, they provide a sound foundation for developing future partnerships with other stakeholders. Partnerships have also been nurtured to develop standardized strategies for addressing common challenges affecting the industry, like climate change. These collaborative plans have allowed firms to share ideas and be better adapted to external challenges affecting the business environment.
At an employee level, partnerships can be sought through interpersonal relationships in the workplace. They are known to increase the productivity and efficiency of employees in the workplace because they allow workers to share ideas and brainstorm on operational matters (Stott and Murphy, 2020). Borrowing from the teachings of Esther Perel, highlighted in the course materials, the same partnership plan can be used to build trust among coworkers because it is the basis for developing productive relationships. This strategy can be implemented in different ways, subject to organizational considerations, but the following template provides a more detailed plan that contextualizes the strategy in my organizational setting.
Conclusion
The recommendations highlighted in this action plan demonstrate the importance of pursuing sustainable objectives in the aviation sector. This approach to leadership encourages organizations to balance environmental, societal, and economic interests in corporate management. Key segments of this action plan discuss leadership, the responsibility to stakeholders, climate change, responsible production and consumption, poverty, and partnerships for sustainable development as key areas of operational management requiring change. The proposed reforms suggest possible strategies that could be implemented at an organizational level to promote the realization of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1 (no poverty), 12 (responsible production and consumption), 13 (climate action), 15 (Life on Land), 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions), and 17 (partnerships and collaboration).
Notably, the recommendations mentioned in this document are tailored to build on current gains made in the sector in promoting CSR initiatives and provide new strategic directions that management should follow to exploit opportunities associated with the adoption of sustainable development and avoid the challenges occasioned by an increasingly constrained global economy. Therefore, the action plan contributes towards enhancing existing knowledge, while creating room for further improvements through an interdisciplinary research approach. This holistic framework of analyzing organizational activities outlines the foundation for merging organizational and SDG goals in the aviation sector.
Reference List
Amnesty International and Afrewatch. (2020) Is my phone powered by child labour?. Web.
Aschendbrand, J., Proctor, J. and Trebilcock, B. (2018) In this issue of SCMR: the ethical supply chain. Web.
ATAG. (2020) Facts and figures. Web.
Benn, S. and Dunphy, D. (2007) Corporate governance and sustainability: challenges for theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Blowfield, M. (2013) Business and sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carpenter, M. and Dunung, S. (2012) Challenges and opportunities in international business. New York, NY: Flat World Knowledge.
Des Jardins, J. and McCall, J. (1996) Contemporary issues in business ethics. 3rd edn. London: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Freise, M. and Seuring, S. (2015) ‘Social and environmental risk management in supply chains: a survey in the clothing industry’, Logistics Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-10.
Hartman, L. P., DesJardins, J. and MacDonald, C. (2014) Business ethics decision making for personal integrity and social responsibility. 3rd edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Howard-Grenville, J. et al. (2014). ‘Climate change and management: from the editors’, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 615-623.
Hunt, A. and Watkiss, P. (2011) ‘Climate change impacts and adaptation in cities: a review of the literature’, Climatic Change, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 13-49.
IBE. (2020) Recent surveys on business ethics. Web.
Jameson, J., Song, X. and Pecht, M. (2016) ‘Conflict minerals in electronic systems: an overview and critique of legal initiatives’, Science Engineering Ethics, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 1375-1389.
Jolly, J. (2020) ‘Cutting battery industry’s reliance on cobalt will be an uphill task’. The Guardian. Web.
Lashley, C. (2016) ‘Business ethics and sustainability’, Research in Hospitality Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-7.
Osobajo, O. A. and Moore, D. (2017) ‘Who is Who? Identifying the different sub-groups of secondary stakeholders within a community: a case study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria,’ International Business Research, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 188-209.
Richter, U. H. and Arndt, F. (2018) ‘Cognitive processes in the CSR decision-making process: a sensemaking perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 4, no. 148, pp. 587-602.
Stott, L. and Murphy, D. F. (2020) ‘An inclusive approach to partnerships for the SDGs: using a relationship lens to explore the potential for transformational collaboration’, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 1-10.
UNICEF. (2020) IKEA, UNICEF programs reach 74 million children in India. Web.
Williams, S. and Preston, D. (2018) ‘Working with values: an alternative approach to win-win’, International Journal of Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-18.
Appendix
Week 1 Reflections: Instinctive Responses
What Should / Would You Do? And why?
The first instinctive response that comes to mind is to profile people who are likely to buy electric cars, such as urban dwellers, environmentalists, and young people.
How Do You Move Beyond An ‘Instinctive’ Response To Analyze And Justify Your Decision-making?
To move beyond my instinctive response, I would base the marketing plan on facts, such as the number of people who share the above demographic qualities and their purchasing history.
Week 2 Reflections: Why are People Interested in How Businesses Behave?
Why Do You Think These Issues Matter To Ethics And Responsibility?
The conduct of businesses and their behavior matters to ethics and responsibility because businesses need to be mindful of their impact on all stakeholders affected by their activities.
Why Are People Interested In What Business Is Doing?
People have an increased understanding of the power of businesses on societies and communities. Consequently, they are demanding more accountability from organizations because they influence various spheres of life.
Week 3 Reflections: “The Courts Are Deciding Who Is To Blame for Climate Change”
If Your Organization Was Being Held Accountable For Its Record On Climate Change, What Actions Do You Continue To Do That Make Climate Change Worse?
The use of fossil fuel to power aircraft would still go on despite its link with greenhouse gas emissions because few developments have occurred in the aviation sector to promote the use of alternative fuels.
What Decisions Have Been Taken That Clearly Impact Negatively On Those Most At Risk?
The growth of budget airlines has increased passenger traffic in major market segments thereby increasing the total volume of greenhouse gases associated with the aviation sector.
Have You Looked To Address Some Of Your Impacts, While Ignoring Others -Why?
Some of the impacts of climate change have been prioritized over others due to financial constraints
Week 4 Reflections: “But why Is More Efficient Resource Use Needed?”
What Resources Do You Depend On That Are Potentially Limited?
Capital is one of the most valuable resources in the aviation industry because of its capital-intensive nature.
Who Controls The Resources That You Need?
The company’s directors and the CEO control the company’s resources.
Who Do You Rely On To Access Those Resources?
We rely on the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) to access these resources.
Week 5 Reflections: Exploring the People Issues – Reflection 2
What Are The Issues Related To People That You Could See From The Rana Plaza / RMG Case Study Resources In Slide 3?
The case study on Rana Plaza underscores the role of managers in protecting employee welfare because thousands of lives were lost due to avoidable circumstances.
How the Case Links With Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability
The case draws attention to the issue of underpayment in the aviation industry and the irresponsibility of some managers to subject employees to unsafe working conditions, which increases their vulnerability to poverty.
Week 6 Reflections:
Who Are Your Organization’s Most Challenging Stakeholders?
Customers are the most challenging stakeholders in the airline industry because of their changing preferences and tastes.
How Might You Engage Those Stakeholders Who Are Currently Dissatisfied With Your Organization?
Customers may be engaged via social media platforms, which allows for real-time communication with company representatives.
Could Any Of Your ‘Challenging’ Stakeholders Potentially Become Future Partners?
Yes. Customers have proved to be an asset for the organization because they provide feedback about our products and services, thereby enabling us to tweak them.