Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes

Introduction

Organizational justice constitutes the blueprint for the successful managerial process that ensures an effective accomplishment of the company’s objectives. According to Fang and Lim (2002), organizational justice refers to a perception reflecting “employees’ senses of decisions, decision-making procedures and supervisors in organizational settings” (p. 2). In this regard, a new generation employee is a representative of the Millennials, currently prevailing in the workforce, who is tasked with the realization of organizational initiatives and their success (Fernandez, 2009). In turn, the level of employees’ motivation and commitment largely depends on managers and their engagement in organizing work within the company (Schalow, 2007). As Greenberg et al. (1993) note, it is critical to consider constant changes in the organizational behavior of a business environment. Looking into potential correlations between new generation employee’s turnover intention and organizational justice can promote the development of solutions to the issue.

The turnover problem can be associated with a lack of organizational justice in the workplace. Employees’ quit intentions can be attributed to several factors, with payment, communication, centralization, and job satisfaction being the primary ones (Price, 2004). According to Samihah (2014), HR practices and job satisfaction are critical indicators for generation Y employees. This data suggests that opting for innovative reward schemes and ensuring the appropriate workplace culture should be the main objectives of the contemporary managers (Du Preez, 2015; Thompson, 2011). Besides, it is crucial to identify the turnover intention in employees at an early stage as it allows the company to control the issue, rather than deal with the built-up consequences (Abid & Hassan Butt, 2017). The research by Chen et al. (2014), who developed a conceptual framework, presents the connection between quit intentions factors. The increase in turnover rates continues to grow among the new generation employees, which identifies the need to investigate the causes of the phenomenon at hand.

This paper takes a closer look at the issue of turnover intention in staff members and its potential relationship with organizational justice. Transforming the practical challenges that prevent organizational justice for the new generation of employees into theoretical levels will allow for working out the solutions to the issues (Alamir et al., 2019). As Nadisic (2006) suggests, organizational commitment can be predicted not only during the “short-term post-allocation phase but also before the decision and one year later” (p. 2). At the same time, Jafari and Bidarian (2012) emphasize the connection between the fair behavior of the company’s management staff and the employees’ behavior patterns. For instance, individual and external equity directly impacts employees’ pay level satisfaction and, consequently, their quit intention (Till & Karren, 2011). These findings suggest that organizational justice can remarkably affect employees’ turnover intention.

Job burnout is another issue examined within the body of this paper. Studies by Cheng et al. (2015) and Zhang and Feng (2011) revealed that professional values drop and quit intention rates grow in medical staff when job burnout occurs. The process of job burnout can be detected on both psychological and physical levels as it is viewed as a synthesis of various factors (Helmer, 1981). According to Oles (2017), fostering psychological capital, controlling workload, providing rewards, and presenting values are critical activities for decreasing job burnout occurrence. The concept of burnout has been extended by many researchers providing the differentiation by profession and job, as well as by country (Koc et al., 2009; Roll et al., 2015). As per Cho et al. (2019), communication-oriented overload frequently contributes to employees’ decision to quit. Overall, the insufficient level of organizational justice is often associated with job burnout, and both issues can lead to increased turnover intention rates.

Key words and Scope

Key words: organizational justice, turnover intention, equity theory, job burnout, power distance.

This paper focuses on analyzing the impact of organizational justice on generation Y employees’ turnover intention. Fernandez (2009) defines new generation employees as the Millennials, who have entered the workforce and whose expectations differ from those of previous generation members. In this regard, such concepts as organizational justice, turnover intention, turnover behavior, job burnout, and power distance are studied in the paper. The research is limited in scope by geographic area, focusing primarily on Chinese employees. Besides, the new generation of employees, namely generation Y, is taken into account by this study.

Problem statement

Gap of Research

This paper provides finding on three significant aspects: organizational justice and turnover intention concerning the new generation employees, organizational justice in relation to turnover intention, and cultural factor. The basic principles of organizational justice are covered by some researchers, such as the mediating role of management and the difference in employees’ commitment based on equity in the workplace (Lim et al., 2017; Diehl et al., 2018). Moreover, some researchers have analyzed the outcomes for business ethics and considered the role of nepotism for turnover intention (Hosmer & Kiewitz, 2005; Kerse & Babadağ, 2018). However, there are not enough studies that limit themselves to the impacts on new generation employees.

It is worth noting that the cultural perspective on the situation for employees in China makes this study location-specific and suggests valuable data for further research. The cultural factor considers behaviors toward organizational justice exhibited by employees based on their cultural background (Tata et al., 2003). Besides, as Akram et al. (2017) state, the two- and three-dimensional viewpoints on the issue can help shape the focus of the research and shift it to interactions and communication. The tendency to build long-lasting connections with employees determines employers’ objective and identifies the need for a detailed view of challenges that prevent organizational justice (Jiang et al., 2017). In this regard, the concept of power distance is studied in the paper and its moderating role in the subject (Zagladi et al., 2015). As Lin et al. (2013) report, the term of power distance should be considered regarding abusive supervision and its adverse influence on a higher turnover intention rate. Overall, there is limited research on all three key aspects listed above, which emphasizes the importance of further studies and a more detailed look at the issue.

Research Question

How does organizational justice impact the turnover intention of new generation employees, and how can the adverse impacts be prevented?

Research Aims and Objectives

Research Aim

To analyze the turnover problems of the new generation employees in China from the perspective of organizational justice.

Research Objectives

Research Objective Method
To investigate the effects of different types of organizational justice (distributive, procedural, and interactional) on employee turnover tendency. Literature analysis
To carry out a comparative analysis of the differences in the effects of different types of organizational justice. Comparative analysis
To collect data for research from face-to-face interviews, online interviews, and secondary literature analysis. Interviews, literature analysis
To conduct the questionnaire on “Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intention Questionnaire” and “Personal Information.” Questionnaire

Significance of the study

The significance of the study lies in its practical benefit for organizations, who can utilize the research findings to control their turnover intention rates. From the HRM perspective, employing and onboarding new professionals is always associated with extra expenses, such as training costs or providing personal equipment. The findings of this research can optimize the HRM procedures and help control the allocation of time, money, and effort on hiring employees.

Dissertation structure

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Literature Review
  • Methodology
  • Results
  • Discussion/Conclusion

References

Abid, G., & Hassan Butt, T. (2017). Expressed turnover intention: Alternate method for knowing turnover intention and eradicating common method bias. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 78. Web.

Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. T., & Puig, L. C. M. (2017). The effect of organizational justice on knowledge sharing: Empirical evidence from the Chinese telecommunications sector. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(3), 134-145.

Alamir, I., Ayoubi, R. M., Massoud, H., & Al Hallak, L. (2019). Transformational leadership, organizational justice and organizational outcomes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Web.

Chen, M. L., Su, Z. Y., Lo, C. L., Chiu, C. H., Hu, Y. H., & Shieh, T. Y. (2014). An empirical study on the factors influencing the turnover intention of dentists in hospitals in Taiwan. Journal of Dental Sciences, 9(4), 332-344.

Cheng, F., Meng, A. F., & Jin, T. (2015). Correlation between burnout and professional value in Chinese oncology nurses: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 153-157. Web.

Cho, J., Lee, H. E., & Kim, H. (2019). Effects of communication-oriented overload in mobile instant messaging on role stressors, burnout, and turnover intention in the workplace. International Journal of Communication, 13, 21.

Diehl, M. R., Richter, A., & Sarnecki, A. (2018). Variations in employee performance in response to organizational justice: The sensitizing effect of socioeconomic conditions. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2375-2404.

Du Preez, W. J. (2015). Generation Y: Incentive and reward schemes [Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington]. Research Archive at Victoria University of Wellington.

Fang, R., & Lim, V. K. G. (2002). Collectivism, machiavellianism, perceived organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: An empirical study of Chinese employees. International Conference on Electronic Business, 8. Web.

Fernandez, S. (2009). Comparing generation X to generation Y on work-related beliefs (Publication No. 3974) [Master’s Thesis, San Jose State University]. SJSU ScholarWorks.

Greenberg, J., Baron, R. A., & Grover, R. A. (1993). Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work. Allyn & Bacon.

Helmer, D. (1981). Burnout, job stress, and job satisfaction in two public health nursing units (Publication No. 1519). [Master’s Thesis, Wilfrid Laurier University]. Wilfrid Laurier University Database.

Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. (2005). Organizational justice: A behavioral science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 67-91.

Jafari, P, & Bidarian, S. (2012). The relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1815–1820. Web.

Jiang, Z., Gollan, P. J., & Brooks, G. (2017). Relationships between organizational justice, organizational trust and organizational commitment: A cross-cultural study of China, South Korea and Australia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(7), 973-1004.

Kerse, G., & Babadağ, M. (2018). I’m out if nepotism is in: The relationship between nepotism, job standardization and turnover intention. Ege Akademik Bakis, 18(4), 631-644.

Koc, H., Arslan, S., & Topaloglu, I. (2009). Differentiation of burnout syndrome by profession and job: Gazi burnout inventory. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 149. Web.

Lim, A. J. P., Loo, J. T. K., & Lee, P. H. (2017). The impact of leadership on turnover intention: The mediating role of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 1(1), 27-41.

Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well‐being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology, 62(2), 308-329.

Nadisic, T. (2006). The motives of organizational justice. HEC School of Management. Web.

Oles, S. K. (2017). The role of psychological capital and the areas of worklife model in predicting job burnout (Publication No. 460) [Bachelor’s Thesis, Eastern Kentucky University]. Eastern Kentucky University Database.

Price, J. L. (2004). The development of a causal model of voluntary turnover. Innovative Theory and Empirical Research on Employee Turnover, 3-34.

Roll, L. C., Siu, O. L., Li, S. Y., & De Witte, H. (2015). Job insecurity: Cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. Web.

Samihah, S. (2014). The mediating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between HR practices and employee retention among generation Y [Doctoral dissertation, Univeristi Utara Malaysia]. UUM eTheses.

Schalow, D. L. (2007). Evaluating new employee orientation utilizing employee-valued criterion. University of Wisconsin-Stout. Web.

Tata, J., Fu, P. P., & Wu, R. (2003). An examination of procedural justice principles in China and the US. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20(2), 205-216.

Thompson, N. W. (2011). Managing the millennials: Employee retention strategies for generation Y (Publication No. 240) [Senior Thesis, Claremont McKenna College]. Keck Graduate Institute.

Till, R. E., & Karren, R. (2011). Organizational justice perceptions and pay level satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(1), 42-57. Web.

Zagladi, A. N., Hadiwidjojo, D., & Rahayu, M. (2015). The role of job satisfaction and power distance in determining the influence of organizational justice toward the turnover intention. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 42-48.

Zhang, Y., & Feng, X. (2011). The relationship between job satisfaction, burnout, and turnover intention among physicians from urban state-owned medical institutions in Hubei, China: A cross-sectional study. BMC health services research, 11(1), 1-13. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

BusinessEssay. (2022, December 9). Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes. https://business-essay.com/transformational-leadership-justice-and-outcomes/

Work Cited

"Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes." BusinessEssay, 9 Dec. 2022, business-essay.com/transformational-leadership-justice-and-outcomes/.

References

BusinessEssay. (2022) 'Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes'. 9 December.

References

BusinessEssay. 2022. "Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes." December 9, 2022. https://business-essay.com/transformational-leadership-justice-and-outcomes/.

1. BusinessEssay. "Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes." December 9, 2022. https://business-essay.com/transformational-leadership-justice-and-outcomes/.


Bibliography


BusinessEssay. "Transformational Leadership, Justice and Outcomes." December 9, 2022. https://business-essay.com/transformational-leadership-justice-and-outcomes/.