Management of Health and Safety

Introduction

The management failed to provide a conducive and healthy working environment for the workers to help curb the adversities associated with sudden injuries and other health issues. Safety planning is a vital element in creating a safe and convenient working environment. Security managers aim to ensure that security is maintained in dangerous situations and, first and foremost, to prevent these situations (“Working Excessive Overtime Can Be Deadly”). The syndicate’s management team fails to promote the workers’ mental and physical well-being despite the argument that these people’s physical and psychological statuses are directly affected by the event and that the psycho-social working environment should be investigated.

Thus, the managers’ poor planning promotes an undesirable culture among the entrusted porters and drivers, making it impossible for them to execute their distinct duties in the moving company. During the investigation, the interviewed driver asserted their dissatisfaction with the management’s prioritization of the profits rather than the worker’s welfare (“Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement”). Where poor safety cultures exist, there will be indifference or even rigidity in individual or isolated efforts to increase health and safety.

The lack of enough personnel to oversee the organizational projects promotes overexertion within the workforce. Whether trying to lift something too heavy or excessive over a prolonged time is very damaging to workers and their businesses (Lauriski). Excessive effort is very serious; a worker who has not taken a break is dehydrated, has little sleep, or has personal problems can easily misjudge his capacity to work securely. He or she may forget about every prior training and ignore his safety.

Specifically, the entrusted managers fail to deploy enough staff members to oversee accomplishing difficult tasks associated with increased injuries within the workplace. If the firm had sent extra employees to help move the piano, the victim would not have suffered the associated consequences (“A Safe Workplace Is Sound Business”). In conclusion, other than the management’s unprofessionalism, the company failed to uphold the celebrated policies aimed to safeguard the welfare of workers in the various workforces.

Reporting The Accident

The experts have pointed out that it is important to collect, record, and report data relating to occupational injuries and disease. This enables them to recognize and investigate the causative factors of such injury and illness to implement safety precautions. Preventive measures are also important; most formats for the occurrence report identify obstacles to the development of adverse events in a severe accident or disaster. The team members talk on a smaller scale about observations that alleviate occupational diseases, discomfort, or waste (“The Importance of Reporting an Accident at Work”).

It is very important to gain insight since it helps managers identify where supplemental support is required to ensure no major incidents, safety, environment, quality, and facilities. Incident reporting is a strategy to foster employee involvement in improving safety, quality, the environment, or safety.

Everyone can see their issues identified and addressed by the organization. Finally, two-way communication is part of the culture improvement, with the stakeholders using it to remind themselves about the potential dangers. This development provides a system to measure obvious risks and underlying causes during recurrence. These difficulties and causative factors are documented, making it more likely that repeated errors will be recognized and corrected before major injuries occur (“The Importance of Reporting an Accident at Work”).

Monitoring or measuring welfare performance in accident and incident reports allows an organization to learn from mistakes and improve safety and improved health through research. In all cases and occurrences, dangerous incidences, illnesses, and minor accidents for all employers, contractors, and visitors, it is important to introduce a system for reporting on the workplace. The accident report may prompt the enforcement authorities to carry out an investigation based on the intensity or the potential for an injury.

When an incident involves employees, they should report it to their line executive. In accident prevention, the employees should inform their supervisors or HR department as quickly as it is necessary to prevent the accident (“Working Excessive Overtime Can Be Deadly”). This effort is essential because of presumed recklessness or inadequate safety. The trusted key players shall record the incidents and any sustained injuries. The authorities concerned shall launch an inquiry if necessary.

Suitability of the Generic Risk Assessment

The company’s approach to assessing the health and safety risk is substantial and vital in guaranteeing that the key players are safe from future risk exposures. Importantly, the evaluation procedure is relevant to the operational practices undertaken within the workplace, making it helpful for the management to make changes that would promote a safe culture within the establishment. Risk analysis is a significant component of your OSH management plan. Risk assessment involves identifying risks, the persons at risk, and determining where countermeasures are required to prevent disease and injury when performing an appropriate assessment (“Working Excessive Overtime Can Be Deadly”).

Although many industries must comply with regulatory prerequisites, the overarching aim of the risk assessment is to give your employees a comfortable, safe environment. Enhancing your team’s security also reduces your company’s potential liability concerns. This strategy includes thorough workplace inspections of the equipment and systems to determine potential dangers and the implementation of injury prevention safety systems. Since every workplace is unique, the safety evaluation should always be personalized on-site based on specific conditions.

In designing, building, and operating any business project, safety is an essential aspect. The efforts by the firm to entrust a qualified occupational health and safety specialist meant that they are dedicated to upholding the specific international policies put in place to safeguard the health and productivity of the employees in their respective workplaces. Thus, it is essential to learn how to respond to safety and handle risk analysis in this establishment. To ensure an effective safety risk assessment, you need to establish a thorough evaluation scope.

Do you have a particular risk point that you evaluate? Or is the objective to carry out a general workplace assessment? Identifying the objective of this analysis is a requisite step in ensuring that the formulation and construction remain on track. The primary tool for effective risk management is appropriate and sufficient risk evaluations, as stated previously (Lauriski). Any employer has to be legally bound and documented where there are five or more employees. Risk assessment is an easy, organized method for adequately eliminating, reducing, or controlling risks to the wellness and safety of employees and others.

Improving Organizational Health and Safety Culture

The removal company has a workplace culture that promotes the health and safety of the workers despite the undesirable injuries that are undermining the productivity of the workers therein. Other than having the post of a safety advisor, the goal-oriented firm has a safe system of operations to reduce the causes of workplace injuries (“Identifying And Assessing Occupational Safety And Health Risks”). Corporate culture references how things are done at work and what is important for the managers and employees, including the common language. The concept of workplace safety is embodied in workers’ mindsets, attitudes, and behavior, supervisors, management, and owners toward safety at work, instead of referring to specific safety policies and programs. An effective and sustainable safety policy encourages a conscious safety culture at work.

For instance, the safety advisor will enlighten the management team and other junior workers about the distinct initiatives that would help reduce the people’s susceptibility to work within the establishment. A safety consultant is a service provider that assists a system’s overall performance in evaluating, designing, planning, and implementing overall safety and helps to maintain an effective occupational safety and security system. The consultant also helps review and reduce operational, economic loss, occupational health issues, accidents, and lesions in protective and preventive measures, which an organization must follow.

The Safety Consultant offers a reliable safety plan to ensure a safe workplace for the enterprise. The practitioner trains and encourages leaders, managers, and other stakeholders to fulfill their roles according to occupational health and safety legislation. Thus, the existence of a safety specialist is an indication of positive safety culture.

Additionally, the safe system introduced by the occupational health specialist to help regulate the duties of the employees therein to help reduce the chances of suffering from unpredicted hazards. Safe working systems become especially important when a major residual risk remains following the introduction of all possible control measures into work processes and when normally present controls have to be excluded so that tasks can be performed during maintenance, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, and construction. A work plan is a series of methods by which work needs to be done (“Identifying And Assessing Occupational Safety And Health Risks”).

Safe working systems are needed when there are no hazards and some risks cannot be eliminated. Please consider how the work is done and the problems that may arise and expose workers to risk when trying to develop their safe work systems. A set of standards should then be developed that detail how to work to minimize or reduce injuries or accidents. Work systems should be communicated by the employees concerned and understood.

Discussing Moral Reasons for Managing Health and Safety

The removal firm displayed health and safety morals despite the recent accidents that occurred. Everyone has the right to work safely in their workplace. They are pleased to be at work and expect to return in the same manner. Same time, people are obliged to respect all safety standards to save themselves and prevent their deeds from harming others. Moral safety is even harder to describe the subject (Lauriski).

It is a pursuit of understanding and an acceptance process. In our social systems, it is an effort to decrease the dishonesty that is expressed and implied. A morally comfortable workplace enables continued ethical dialog and a higher sense and purpose to be searched. The value of honesty, compassion, the pursuit of integrity, goodness, courage, justice, honoring the past, and the hope for the future is articulated and manifested in reality. The drivers and other workers displayed honesty during the investigation, including assessing the safety measures within the establishment.

Although the management invested a significant amount of resources in assessing and recommending alternative ways of promoting a safe space, they ignored the need for an extra workforce during the piano movement. Safe environments need to be able to analyze and tackle power abuse both by customers and employees in a manner that promotes learning, growth, and change in detail (“A Safe Workplace Is Sound Business”). A morally secure environment is continuously struggling with honesty and integrity. That means starting with assessing our assumptions, training, rationalizations, solid beliefs, and practice in each environment. In this respect, the company remains morally safe and healthy despite the controversies surrounding its operations and existing culture.

Role and Responsibility of the Manager

Educating the managers about the significance of the health and safety management system will play a crucial role in reducing the chances of poor management associated with increased employee injuries and reduced productivity. Like all managerial activities, management of health and safety involves active governance from above. Managers are integral to health and safety management, particularly at the senior level, and are accountable for policy and goals. Managers link the panel and the employees to efficient communication down and upward within organizational structures (“Moral Expectations of Good Standards of Health And Safety”). Managers need to show a positive attitude toward health and safety to bring their staff down to the hierarchy. A holistic approach to safety and health is cheaper than a reactive approach to dealing with failure outcomes.

Recommending the introduction of a new amendment to the existing health and safety model promotes employees’ health and safety. In preparing the safeguarding policy based on Section 20 of the Safety, Health, and Welfare at Work Act 2005, the workplace should prepare an occupational safety and health policy program (“Moral Expectations of Good Standards of Health and Safety”).

A concrete plan for the organization to follow should be an effective health and safety policy. As part of its commitment to continuous improvement, it will contribute to the realization of business performance. Personal and workplace responsibilities will be fulfilled in ways that comply with the law in spirit and letter. Effective approaches to physical and human resources conservation and development will lessen economic losses and liabilities. Whether shareholders, employees, or representatives of their companies, customers, or society in general, the stakeholders’ expectations can be fulfilled in a broader context.

Proper planning is another way to ensure that the safety and health measures are effective. A plan for the safety and sanitary policies outlined in the health and safety policy must be formulated in the workplace. For the implementation of a policy, it is necessary to have an effective organizational structure and arrangements (“Moral Expectations of Good Standards of Health and Safety”). For all employees and managers, occupational health and safety objectives and objectives should be set to ensure that the entrusted tea execute their safety and health responsibilities diligently.

Reviewing First-Aid Arrangements

Other than reviewing the stakeholders’ commitment to the relevant legislation, considering the available resources is vital to determine the effectiveness of the first-aid provision. First-aiders have the responsibility of preserving life and ensuring that workers within the establishment remain productive. First aid provision should, in the circumstances, be “sufficient and adequate.” This phrase means that adequate first-aid equipment, facilities, and staff must be provided in all circumstances. The key players should pursue a first-aid needs analysis to assess which provisions they must make (“First Aid At Work”). This evaluation should take account of the instances of their workplace, employees, and possible risks. The results help them decide what emergency relief frameworks they need to implement.

Moreover, the Health and Safety legislations need to be taken into keen consideration during the assessment. Employers are required by the 1981 Health and Safety (First Aid) Regulations to ensure that employees lead to immediate cases where their injuries and working conditions are adequate and appropriate to their equipment, facilities, and staff. All jobs, even those with only around five employees and self-employed, are covered by these regulations. What is adapted and suitable ‘depends on the working conditions.

This program encompasses whether trained first aid personnel are required, what will be included in the first aid case, and a need for a first aid room. Employers should evaluate first aid needs to find out what they are going to provide (“First Aid At Work”). The Rules of Procedure do not give employers the legal obligation to provide first aid in schools to non-employees, including the public or children. HSE recommends strongly, however, that non-employees should be involved and provided for in an evaluation for first-aid needs.

Additionally, I would consider the qualifications levels of the workers working within the removal company. The qualification of employees needs to include their awareness of the existing health and safety measures and policies recommended for the company (“First Aid At Work”). Moreover, the risk factors for the level of first aid endowments, such as the firm’s size and the workforce’s distribution, would determine the successful provision of the first-aid services in remote removal practices.

Reactive Monitoring Information That Gives Cause for Concern

The incompetence of the organizational leaders and lack of trust in the management are crucial causes for concern. Leadership is essential for injury prevention and safety in the workplace since leaders’ culture determines how much injury is “acceptable.” They will continue to endorse injuries until they decide that the accidents are unacceptable and take adequate action. One of the leader’s main tasks is to guide employees in the performance of their jobs — identify questions that prevent effective production and address them.

Failure in the area often reflects the low productivity of employees. It is not just an ethical and legal obligation to protect workers from injuries and ill health. Thus, the consistent mistrust between the management and the workers indicates that the company might experience increased workplace deaths and injuries when prompt measures are not taken into consideration.

The management team plays an important role as a model for safety culture to facilitate the safe implementation of a construction site. In addition, management and management support to guarantee its effectiveness and contribution to the enterprise’s success must be provided to site managers and other workers on the estate (“Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement”). Leader organizations and work activities plan, lead, control, and integrate work. They also significantly impact global work demands, regulations, and social support, all of which significantly impact employee health. Therefore, they primarily influence working conditions and decide on changing workplace and workplace (“A Safe Workplace Is Sound Business”). The level of health and safety at work is determined in all of these respects. Thus, it would be wise for the entrusted stakeholders to oversee an improved leadership structure to ensure that all key players collaborate and promote much-needed workplace safety.

References

“A Safe Workplace Is Sound Business”. United States Department of Labor. n.d. Web.

“First Aid At Work”. WorkSafe, 2020. Web.

“Identifying And Assessing Occupational Safety And Health Risks.” The Center for Occupational Safety. n.d. Web.

“Moral Expectations Of Good Standards Of Health And Safety”. Stockwell Safety. n.d. Web.

“Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement”. Skybra, 2019. Web.

“The Importance of Reporting An Accident At Work”. True Solicitors LLP, 2020. Web.

“Working Excessive Overtime Can Be Deadly”. EHSToday, Endeavor Business Media, LLC., 2021. Web.

Lauriski, David. “7 Characteristics of a Positive Safety Culture at Work. “Predictive Safety, 2020. Web.