The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations

Cite this

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) positively impacts all the performance indicators of an organization, including brand differentiation, governance, financial operations, employee commitment, and improved productivity. Companies are increasingly adopting the concept of CSR and ethics as indispensable components of sustainable business activities and the firms’ obligations to the society in which they operate. CSR proponents assert that socially responsible entities realize positive impacts on their bottom lines and communal, financial, and environmental returns. However, ethics differ significantly from CSR programs in that the former encompasses the moral standards and principles which guide the organizations’ behavior in the conduct of their business. The latter is an integrative managerial concept, establishing responsible practices and operations in society. Although companies incur considerable costs in implementing CSR programs, they boost the firms’ bottom lines, help attract comparatively talented employees, and gain a competitive advantage in engaging investors.

On-Time Delivery!
Get your customized and 100% plagiarism-free paper done in as little as 3 hours
Let’s start
322 specialists online

CSR and how it Differs from Business Ethics

Although CSR and business ethics are often used interchangeably, each has a distinct meaning. Whereas the latter encompasses the moral standards and principles which guide and regulate the behavior of organizations as they conduct their businesses, the former is an integrative managerial concept establishing responsible within a company. According to Adda, Azigwe, & Awumi (2016), business ethics’ codes of values govern the actions, practices, and activities of an entity, effectively creating a dichotomy of what is socially acceptable or inappropriate. This implies that although organizations engage in business to derive maximum possible profit and benefits for shareholders and owners, the pursuit of profitability should be regulated and directed by morally appropriate behaviors. From this perspective, business ethics are exclusively concerned with the execution of practices for the benefit of all, including stakeholders, employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, and employees. For instance, fair remuneration to employees and charging reasonable prices for their products are ethical business decisions informed by the conscious desire to avoid exploitative tendencies. Similarly, paying suppliers promptly and adhering to the agreed terms is a prominent ethical practice in procurement.

Conversely, CSR is a concept which encourages socially responsible behaviors through a form of self-regulation integrated into the organizations’ business model. This implies that business which adopts CSR demonstrate a notable sense of obligation to the society and the physical environment in which they operate. In this regard, corporates are conscious of the impacts of their economic activities and adopt deliberate efforts to enhance and improve the community and the environment. Agudelo, Jóhannsdóttir, & Davídsdóttir, (2019) contend that CSR is a corporate governance principle anchored on voluntary prosocial policies designed to positively impact the world. For instance, firms may opt to minimize environmental externalities, such as reducing pollution voluntarily. This differs significantly from the ethical concerns since the benefits of the activities are realized by the wider society instead of the exclusive group of people with a direct relationship with the organization.

Benefits of Effective CSR

Organizations with consistently demonstrate the commitment to and operationalize effective CSR initiatives reap numerous benefits from their socially responsible deeds. In a competitive business environment, companies realize the mutually beneficial nature of CSR programs and are increasingly adopting them as a business strategy. These initiatives positively influence the firm’s efficiency, establish a robust brand image and awareness, and achieve customer loyalty and commitment (Newman, Rand, Tarp, & Trifkovic, 2020). Additionally, businesses realize increased profitability, gain competitive advantage, and improve employee satisfaction (Tiba, van Rijnsoever, & Hekkert 2018). In this regard, effective CSR initiatives improve numerous aspects of an organization and promote efficiency, productivity, and overall performance.

Additionally, CSR programs positively influence the firms’ ability to attract investors, boost organizational bottom lines, and draw talent to the business. For instance, these strategies offer an influential platform through which companies tap into the consumers’ sentiments, providing an allowance for charging a premium for products or services rendered. Similarly, CSR initiatives reinforce the entity’s positive public image, brand awareness, differentiation, and identity, which foster customer loyalty and trust. Moreover, these programs increase employee engagement and boost productivity, helping the business enhance its financial performance. In this regard, the organizations realize improvement performances in their bottom lines due to the influence of the programs on the behavioral intentions of consumers and employees.

Further, effective CSR programs are an effective organizational strategy to attract investors and talent to the organization. Notably, people are more likely to infuse resources and support companies which demonstrate the commitment to socially responsible behavior. According to Lee, Jóhannsdóttir, and Davídsdóttir (2017), investors are increasingly expressing interest and appreciation of businesses which elevate and promote the wellbeing of the communities and societies in which they operate. Notably, people intending to invest capital in companies view CSR as an indicator of transparency and honesty in financial reporting and other operations (Benlemlih & Bitar, 2018). Similarly, CSR activities and the resultant image enhance the organizational attractiveness to high-quality and talented employees. Generally, a good reputation is a critical factor in attracting, retaining, and keeping premium employees motivated (Ibrahim, 2017; Galant & Cadez, 2017). Therefore, CSR programs are an effective business strategy for organizations to attract investors and talent.

The Contrast of the CSR Benefits to the Drawbacks

Although CSR is highly beneficial to an organization, there are various drawbacks associated with this strategy. For instance, the ultimate objective on which businesses are initiated is profit maximization. In this regard, CSR activities are distinctly in conflict with this primary motive and ultimately reduce an entity’s profit margins in the short run (Hategan, Sirghi, Curea-Pitorac, & Hategan, 2018). Additionally, these programs distort the firm’s resource allocation by redirecting them into economically unrelated engagements. This is closely associated with the emergence of operational challenges due to the conceptual differences in business motives and social wellbeing. Comparatively, the benefits which an organization can derive by engaging in CSR programs greatly outweigh the various adverse impacts of the initiatives.

Yes, we can!
Our experts can deliver a custom The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations paper for only $13.00 $11/page
Learn More
322 specialists online

Balancing CSR and Shareholder Profitability

Organizations adopt various models to strike a balance between CSR initiatives and shareholders’ profitability. In corporate governance, this is a critically prominent consideration as it ensures that no particular venture extinguishes the other as the company strives to balance and align the interests of the corporation, society, and stakeholders. To achieve this, organizations may opt to follow the stakeholders’ or shareholders’ theory. Notably, the former is widely used by corporations and indicates that companies are socially ingrained institutions, and managers are morally obliged to stabilize the interests of all the stakeholders. This model argues that a business can guarantee its sustainability and long-term survival by balancing the concerns of stakeholders and the primary purpose of the company (Naseem, Lin, Rehman, Ahmad, &Ali, 2019). For instance, a business entity can advance internal stakeholders’ interests, such as customers, employees, and suppliers, by charging fair prices, implementing reasonable remuneration, and ensuring prompt payments. The interests of external partners, such as the government, competitors, and special interest groups, can be achieved through the payment of rightful taxes and avoiding unscrupulous competition. In this regard, organizational accomplish this balance by implementing the shareholder model of corporate governance.

Costs of Creating and Maintaining a CSR Program

Running an effective CSR program is a substantially expensive engagement, and organizations incur various costs, including opportunity, sunk, and recurrent expenditures. The former includes the financial benefits or activities lost which could not have been undertaken due to the committed resources in the CSR. The sunk costs are the initial investments in the program, including the monetary implications of developing a waste-water system in the neighborhood (Ruggiero & Cupertino, 2018). The latter entails the periodic expenses incurred to monitor, maintain, report, and update the CSR initiatives. It is imperative for organizations to understand these costs to develop a clear understanding of what they stand to gain and lose from a particular program.

Globalization, Cultural Dimensions, and the Overall Impact of CSR on Contemporary Organizations

Globalization plays an influential role in steering the evolution and adoption of CSR. Although there are notable differences in CSR development, there is a robust connection to the modernization and internationalization of the process. As businesses increasingly escalate their operations to global standards, they are exposed to the need to adopt internationally reputable practices in their operations, such as in the distribution value chains. However, these activities are impacted by the respective cultures due to the inherently context-specific of CSR (Vollero, Siano, Palazzo, & Amabille, 2019). In this regard, economic, philanthropic, legal, and ethical are critical traditional factors which influence CSR. Overall, organizations ought to be aware of the scope of the ethical obligations pertaining to states in the era of globalization, particularly regarding working conditions, outsourcing practices, integrity, equal opportunity, human rights, and workplace diversity. Thus, companies are increasingly adopting and integrating CSR to promote their performance and improve the environmental and social wellbeing.


Corporate social responsibility is an integral component in the execution and conduct of modern business operations. It directly contributes to the organization’s ability to boost its bottom lines, attract investors, and recruit high-quality personnel. Notably, these benefits greatly outweigh the drawbacks and costs associated with CSR programs. Although global trends significantly influence these initiatives, it is imperative for organizations to ensure that they are context-specific for enhanced outcomes.


Adda, G., Azigwe, J. B., & Awumi, A. R. (2016). Business ethics and corporate social responsibility for business success and growth. European Journal of Business and Innovation Research, 4(6), 26–42. Retrieved from

Agudelo, L. M., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–23.

Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 647–671.

Cut 15% OFF your first order
We’ll deliver a custom Management paper tailored to your requirements with a good discount
Use discount
322 specialists online

Galant, A., & Cadez, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 676–693.

Hategan, C., Sirghi, N., Curea-Pitorac, R., & Hategan, V. (2018). Doing well or doing good: The relationship between corporate social responsibility and profit in romanian companies. Sustainability, 10(4), 1041. doi: 10.3390/su10041041

Ibrahim, F. N. (2017). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and employer attractiveness in Egypt: The moderating effect of the individual’s income. Contemporary Management Research, 13(2), 81–106.

Lee, J., Kim, S., & Kwon, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a strategic means to attract foreign investment: Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 9(11), 2121.

Naseem, M., Lin, J., Rehman, R., Ahmad, M., & Ali, R. (2019). Moderating role of financial ratios in corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm value. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215430

Newman, C., Rand, J., Tarp, F., & Trifkovic, N. (2020). Corporate social responsibility in a competitive business environment. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(8), 1455–1472.

Ruggiero, P., & Cupertino, S. (2018). CSR strategic approach, financial resources and corporate social performance: The mediating effect of innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), 3611. doi: 10.3390/su10103611

Get a custom-written paper
For only $13.00 $11/page you can get a custom-written academic paper according to your instructions
Let us help you
322 specialists online

Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Firms with benefits: A systematic review of responsible entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility literature. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 265–284.

Vollero, A., Siano, A., Palazzo, M., & Amabile, S. (2019). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and corporate social responsibility in online communication: Are they independent constructs? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 53–64.

Cite this paper

Select style


BusinessEssay. (2022, September 5). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations. Retrieved from


BusinessEssay. (2022, September 5). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations.

Work Cited

"The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations." BusinessEssay, 5 Sept. 2022,


BusinessEssay. (2022) 'The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations'. 5 September.


BusinessEssay. 2022. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations." September 5, 2022.

1. BusinessEssay. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations." September 5, 2022.


BusinessEssay. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Contemporary Organizations." September 5, 2022.