The METCO Company: Case Study

Introduction

Financial management is often regarded as the key aspect of successful business activity, regardless of the business sphere and marketing strategy applied. Considering the fact that transport companies are hardly dependent on the matters of machinery amortization, financial management should consider all the aspects of technical services, maintenance, and operational costs associated with amortization, maintenance, and re-equipment of the vehicles.

The aim of this paper is to analyze the case of METCO Company linked with maintenance, operation, overhaul, and benefits of the Nile SS. Variants that are available for the analysis are the overhaul of the Nile SS with and without the new engine and control system. The analysis will be based on the spreadsheet with the costs and benefits, including taxes, depreciation, and inflation rates.

Problem and Case Description

The case details involve the dilemma of the METCO management, associated with including the Nile SS into the business operation. In fact, this is a 25 years old vessel, and it is not in the perfect condition. There are several alternatives: sell it, overhaul it, or continue its operation by including all the necessary service and repair expenses into the yearly budget. In general, every alternative is featured with a particular advantages and disadvantages, as well as financial consequences. The least beneficial variant is to sell the Nile SS. However, the book value of the vessel, as well as the spare parts for it involve EGP 100 000 for the vessel, and EGP 40 000 for the spare parts in accordance with the inventory book. It is stated that the total sales sum may be EGP 200 000, however, this will immediately originate a tax liability because of the difference in the sale price and book value.

Therefore, the most reliable and credible alternative is maintenance of the m/v. However, it should be defines which alternative will be more beneficial. The factors that should be considered involve numerous aspects of sea transportation business, as well the costs imposed by various regulations. Additionally, the case does not include possible changes in oil price, changes in operating expenses of the company, world economic processes, as well as the situation in the sphere of transportation. Hence, the report can not be full without considering these aspects. In accordance with the research by Cheng (247), these factors may be summarized in depreciation rate that generally varies from 8% to 20% yearly.

Financial Analysis

The analysis will be based on the two defined alternatives that will be applied. The general case data, that is common for both alternatives involve the tax rate, depreciation rate, inflation, as well as the revenues derived from the Nile SS. The first alternative is the operation without installing a brand-new engine and control system. The operation time will be taken in two variants: 10 years, and 12 years.

Overhaul Expenses
Overhaul Engine and generators340 000
Replace radar and other electronic equipment75 000
Hull and superstructure repair310 000
Painting95 000
Total820 000
Year12345
Fuel450 000461 250472 781.3484 600.8496 715.8
Labour and Benefits480 000492 000504 300516 907.5529 830.2
Maintenance141 000144 525148 138.1151 841.6155 637.6
Other110 000112 750115 568.8118 458121 419.4
Total yearly1 181 0001 210 5251 240 7881 271 8081 303 603
Total Period
Revenues1 400 0001 435 0001 470 8751 507 6471 545 338
Pre tax Profit219 000224 475230 086.9235 839241 735
Including Tax142 350145 908.8149 556.5153 295.4157 127.8
Depreciation (8%)130 962134 236.1137 592141 031.8144 557.5
Total Period
Depreciation (20%)113 880116 727119 645.2122 636.3125 702.2
Year6789101112
Fuel509 133.7521 862534 908.6548 281.3561 988.3576 038590 439
Labour and Benefits543 075.9556 652.8570 569.2584 833.4599 454.2614 440.6629 801.6
Maintenance159 528.6163 516.8167 604.7171 794.8176 089.7180 491.9185 004.2
Other124 454.9127 566.3130 755.4134 024.3137 374.9140 809.3144 329.5
Total yearly1 336 1931 369 5981 403 8381 438 9341 474 9071 511 7801 549 574
Total Period 13 231 194 16 292 548
Revenues1 583 9711 623 5711 664 1601 705 7641 748 4081 792 1181 836 921
Pre tax Profit247 778.4253 972.9260 322.2266 830.2273 501280 338.5287 347
Including Tax161 056165 082.4169 209.4173 439.7177 775.6182 220186 775.5
1 594 801 1 963 797
Depreciation (8%)148 171.5151 875.8155 672.7159 564.5163 553.6167 642.4171 833.5
Total Period 1 467 217 1 806 693
Depreciation (20%)128 844.8132 065.9135 367.5138 751.7142 220.5145 776149 420.4
Total Period 1 275 841 1 571 038
Depreciation8%20%
10 year income647 217.3455 841.1
12 year income986 693.2751 037.6

The results of the calculation are given in the last table. Anyway, the revenue will be higher if the ship will be operating for 12 yeas, however, there is a high probability that maintenance costs will be essentially higher by the end of this period, and the total incomes will lower. As for another alternative, the early expenses will be lower, the overhaul costs will be featured with additional EGP 600 000. (Solbakken and Hjertaker, 17)

Overhaul ExpensesWith new-brand engine and system installation
Overhaul Engine and generators340 000 + 600 000
Replace radar and other electronic equipment75000
Hull and superstructure repair310000
Painting95000
Total1420000
Year12345
Fuel400 000410 000420 250430 756.3441 525.2
Labour and Benefits405 000415 125425 503.1436 140.7447 044.2
Maintenance105 000107 625110 315.6113 073.5115 900.4
Other110 000112 750115 568.8118 458121 419.4
Total yearly1 020 0001 045 5001 071 6381 098 4281 125 889
Total Period
Revenues1 400 0001 435 0001 470 8751 507 6471 545 338
Pre tax Profit380 000389 500399 237.5409 218.4419 448.9
Including Tax247 000253 175259 504.4265 992272 641.8
Depreciation (8%)227 240232 921238 744244 712.6250 830.4
Total Period
Depreciation (20%)197 600202 540207 603.5212 793.6218 113.4
Year6789101112
Fuel452 563.3463 877.4475 474.3487 361.2499 545.2512 033.8524 834.7
Labour and Benefits458 220.3469 675.8481 417.7493 453.2505 789.5518 434.2531 395.1
Maintenance118 797.9121 767.8124 812127 932.3131 130.6134 408.9137 769.1
Other124 454.9127 566.3130 755.4134 024.3137 374.9140 809.3144 329.5
Total yearly1 154 0361 182 8871 212 4591 242 7711 273 8401 305 6861 338 328
Total Period 11 427 449 14 071 464
Revenues1 583 9711 623 5711 664 1601 705 7641 748 4081 792 1181 836 921
Pre tax Profit429 935.1440 683.5451 700.6462 993.1474 567.9486 432.1498 592.9
Including Tax279 457.8286 444.3293 605.4300 945.5308 469.2316 180.9324 085.4
2 767 235 3 407 502
Depreciation (8%)257 101.2263 528.7270 117276 869.9283 791.6290 886.4298 158.6
Total Period 2 545 856 3 134 901
Depreciation (20%)223 566.3229 155.4234 884.3240 756.4246 775.3252 944.7259 268.3
2 213 788 2 726 001
Depreciation8%20%
10 year income1 125 856793 788.2
12 year income1 714 9011 306 001

Therefore, considering all the depreciation rates, inflation, taxes, and costs, the possible income will be as stated in the table. Nevertheless, like in the previous case, the maintenance and service costs may increase essentially by the end of the period. Comparing the results of both alternatives, regardless of the initial costs that are essentially larger, the decreased operating costs are lower for the entire period, and, even considering the worst depreciation scenario, the total benefits will be approx. 73% higher.

With Engine UpgradeWithout Engine Upgrade
8%20%8%20%
10 year income1 125 856793 788.210 year income647 217.3455 841.1
12 year income1 714 9011 306 00112 year income986 693.2751 037.6

As for the matters of depreciation and inflation, it should be stated that these values play their particular role in the calculation. Inflation and depreciation rates have been included into the spreadsheets, nevertheless, further calculations reveal that yearly income will be higher if the operation period is 12 yeas. (Brigham and Ehrhardt, 827) Hence, there are results as given below for both alternatives:

First alternativeSecond Alternative
8%12%8%12%
10 years64721.7345584.1110 years112585.679378.82
12 years82224.4362586.4712 years142908.5108833.4

Conclusion

Considering the fact that METCO company has at least three alternatives that are featured with profit, one of these alternatives had been rejected due to its inconsistency, and the opportunity of low income. The other two alternatives are analyzed properly with considering the depreciation rates, as well as the yearly inflation rate. Considering the results achieved, the lower maintenance costs of the second alternative will be able to compensate the expenses associated with engine and control system upgrade, so, the final income, regardless of the depreciation rate, and operating period will be approximately 73% higher. However, the analysis does not involve the opportunity of the increased technical maintenance costs by the end of the operating period, as this data is not given in the case description.

Works Cited

Brigham, Eugene., Ehrhardt, Michael. Financial Management: Theory and Practice. South-Western College Pub. Oxford 2004.

Cheng, Philip. Financial Management in the Shipping Industry. Cornell Maritime Pr/Tidewater Pub. London 2004.

Solbakken, Lars., Hjertaker, Ole. Ship Finance International Limited – Filing of Annual Report On Form 20-F. Ship Finance International Limited. Hamilton 2007. Web.

Cite this paper

Select style

Reference

BusinessEssay. (2024, April 12). The METCO Company: Case Study. https://business-essay.com/the-metco-company-case-study/

Work Cited

"The METCO Company: Case Study." BusinessEssay, 12 Apr. 2024, business-essay.com/the-metco-company-case-study/.

References

BusinessEssay. (2024) 'The METCO Company: Case Study'. 12 April.

References

BusinessEssay. 2024. "The METCO Company: Case Study." April 12, 2024. https://business-essay.com/the-metco-company-case-study/.

1. BusinessEssay. "The METCO Company: Case Study." April 12, 2024. https://business-essay.com/the-metco-company-case-study/.


Bibliography


BusinessEssay. "The METCO Company: Case Study." April 12, 2024. https://business-essay.com/the-metco-company-case-study/.