A company’s ability to make profits and apply its principal business strategy is evaluated using financial performance. Additionally, evaluation is a crucial phrase that can be utilized in assessing the entire company’s financial health over a specific period. Investors and analysts frequently use financial performance to evaluate companies in the same industry or to compare sectors or industries in aggregate (Alshehhi et al., 2018). Investors value financial performance because it provides a window into a company’s overall health and performance. Therefore, this paper will evaluate the relevance of finance performance measures and targets in assessing the ability of a commercial company to fulfil its corporate mission using real world examples.
To enhance decision-making and ensure the company’s continued success, Nokia for example needs to have a comprehensive awareness of the numerous financial accounting concepts. A firm needs to have a solid grasp of its everyday operations to accurately understand its financial performance (Ichsan et al., 2021). Financial KPIs, also known as Key Performance Indicators, are key measurements used in an organization to track, measure, and assess a company’s health and well-being. These key performance indicators (KPIs) are split into a few distinct categories: liquidity, valuation, profitability, efficiency, and solvency.
If one has a solid understanding of these indications and how they should be applied, they will be in a better position to identify the extent to which the company’s financial operations are performing successfully. After that, the information can be used to adjust the aims of a group or an entire department inside the company, thereby contributing to several significant long-term strategic objectives (Ichsan et al., 2021). It is necessary for the managers who work for a particular company to ensure that the metrics and key performance indicators (KPIs) utilized by that company are easily available and maintained up to date to fulfill the many different needs.
It is essential to keep an eye on a number of different financial performance indicators in order to get an accurate picture of how the company is doing overall. If the organization is going to be successful, then these steps are required (Tien et al., 2020). The gross profit margin is the primary metric that needs to be taken into consideration. Indicated by this ratio, one factor that can be used to evaluate the level of profitability of a company is the amount of income that is left over after deducting the costs of all of the company’s various items sold. Another factor that can be used to evaluate the level of profitability of a company is the gross profit margin (Alshehhi et al., 2018). When determining an organization’s cost of goods sold, also known as the ‘direct cost of products,’ interest, operating costs, and taxes are not taken into account. This is because these expenses are not directly related to the production of the commodities being sold.
The net profit margin is the second significant financial measure to consider. It is considered to be the profitability ratio used for monitoring what percent of revenue and other incomes is left after deducting all of the business costs, taking into account the price of goods sold, the levies, interests, and also the costs of operation in an organization. This is done to determine whether or not the business is profitable. A key financial performance metric that should be addressed and monitored in a business is the amount of working capital available for use (Cho et al., 2019). It is used to quantify the existing working liquidity of a business, which is money that may be put toward funding an organization’s day-to-day operations if necessary.
The current ratio can also be used to evaluate a company’s financial health. For example, Nokia corporation uses current ratio, or a liquidity ratio, to determine the company’s capacity to satisfy its numerous short-term obligations (Kyere & Ausloos, 2021). Another essential metric of financial performance is the quick ratio, sometimes known as the ‘acid test ratio.’ Liquidity ratios are used to gauge the ability of a company to meet its short-term responsibilities, and this ratio falls within that category. Cash and other liquid current assets are the only assets that can be used for this purpose. An equity multiplier is a financial performance metric used to quantify the impact of financial leverage on a company’s financial results. A real world example is when a business uses debt to acquire various assets (Alshehhi et al., 2018). If all investments are funded by equity, the multiplier drops to zero. It increases in line with an organization’s rising debt.
The debt-to-equity ratio is another method that may be utilized to assess the financial performance of a company. This is a measure of the ability of a company to fund itself through the equity used in calculating the solvency ratio (Nirino et al., 2021). The ratio is important in an organization because it provides a clear insight into the organization’s solvency by reflecting on the ability of the shareholders’ equity to cover all debts if a particular business experiences a downturn. This is why the ratio is vital in an organization: (Kyere & Ausloos, 2021). A financial performance measure known as inventory turnover, also known as an efficiency ratio, is used to determine the number of times a company sold its inventory in a given accounting period. This is accomplished by the utilization of the inventory turnover ratio.
One financial performance measure that falls under the efficiency ratio category is the total asset turnover. It evaluates how productively a company makes use of its resources in order to make a profit (Alshehhi et al., 2018). Higher turnover ratios are indicative of an efficient business model. A company’s return on equity (ROE) is also a significant financial metric to monitor. Net profit divided by shareholder equity is the most often used profitability ratio. Managers in a business also consider operating cash flow and seasonality when evaluating financial performance. The amount of money a company can raise via its various operations is known as operating cash flow. The metric can be interpreted in two ways: positive or negative. Seasonality which is a financial metric, has an impact on the financial performance and KPIs of a company. As a result, these financial performance measurements are a good indicator of a company’s profitability and efficiency.
There are a many reasons why businesses should concentrate on making use of financial performance measures, including the fact that these metrics have various relevance and reasons why they work. Regularly monitoring their company’s financial performance is one of the most important responsibilities for prosperous businesses to concentrate on (Alshehhi et al., 2018). A real world example is when a company’s management can clearly understand where the business currently stands from the perspective of performance and where the corporate is heading with its assets (Alshehhi et al., 2018). In such a scenario, the organization has an additional advantage, which helps it perform better and get better (Assenga et al., 2018). There is a significant amount of involvement from business owners in the decision-making process; these owners base their decisions on the many different financial performance measurements that are utilized by the firm.
The monitoring of various financial performances is vital because it provides crucial insight that helps in the responses to various questions in a company, such as the areas of the company that are the most and least profitable, the losses and gains in the financial strength of the business. This pricing point optimizes both the profit made by an organization as well as the performance of the company over a specific period. The provision of additional information on the results of various operations, the cash flow in an organization, and the financial status of an organization is the primary purpose of utilizing financial performance metrics. An effective method of allocating resources in a corporation greatly depends on the information provided by the managers. This is due to the fact that the data gives a useful method for determining how to distribute resources.
It is important to note that every financial statement that is utilized in an organization serves a particular purpose, and this is something that can be observed at each different level. For example, the purpose of the income statement is to provide the reader with information regarding the capacity of a certain company to earn sufficient profit to cover its essential operations. A company’s total sales and the features of its costs can be determined, in part, by the method through which information regarding expenditures is recorded. It is notable that the income statement, when viewed appropriately, can be utilized to analyze the trend of outcomes of given firm operations. This is the case when the income statement is used.
On the other hand, the primary purpose of a balance sheet is to provide the reader with information regarding the company’s present status in relation to the beginning and ending periods documented in the balance sheet (Cho et al., 2019). The information is necessary for the company’s operation since it determines a particular entity’s funding, debt, and liquidity status and serves as the foundation for a number of different liquidity ratios. On the other hand, a cash flow statement is used to display the status of an organization’s cash disbursement and cash receipts through various categories. This is done in contrast to an income statement, which only shows cash receipts (Shabbir & Wisdom, 2020). Since cash flows do not always correlate with expenses and sales, an organization must have access to this information, as shown in the income statements.
To ensure that the organization’s mission is met, financial performance measurements are essential. The financial performance metrics and targets of a particular organization are shown to be contingent on credit decisions within that organization (Uyar et al., 2020). Lenders typically consider all available financial facts before deciding when determining whether or not to give credit to a firm. Financial statements, for example, might be used as a basis for debt repayment. Financial performance measurements are crucial to establish a company’s creditworthiness and whether or not it can be loaned money (Abdel-Basset et al., 2020). This tool makes adapting their operations to suit the demand for loans more manageable. To meet the organization’s needs, a firm modifies its operations to fit those needs and how the company may be improved to use those needs with existing resources in the organization.
Secondly, different investment decisions inside an organization are developed based on the business’s financial performance indicators and aims. It is important to note that investors frequently base their decisions on whether or not to invest in a company and the price per share they can invest in the financial information provided to them. This is true of any organization. Therefore, financial information demonstrates how the company is functioning and whether or not the firm is earning a profit from its activities. If the company is not making a profit, this indicates that the company’s operations are not profitable (Kyere & Ausloos, 2021). In addition to those mentioned above, it is important to note that the acquirer uses these essential pieces of information when determining the price at which they will make an offer to buy a particular organization.
The decisions an organization makes about their taxation policies are considered significant since they follow the firm’s financial performance objectives and aims. When determining the appropriate level of taxation to apply to a specific company, governmental agencies will frequently consider the variety of earnings and assets that comprise the business in question (Prayag et al., 2018). This essential knowledge can be gleaned from a company’s financial performance measurements and other goals it has successfully attained. Since financial information reveals both the organization’s operating income and assets, it is the financial information that ultimately decides how the company will be taxed (Levytska et al., 2020). How the corporation sells its wares and performs its services might also be revealed, which can impact the taxes levied against it.
Establishing financial performance measures and targets is also important since these factors are factored into the decisions reached during union negotiations in a specific environment. In most cases, labor unions base their decisions on the bargaining position on the perceived financial stability of the company they are negotiating with (Barauskaite & Streimikiene, 2021). This information is crucial and can be derived from a firm’s many different financial statements. Because of this, a union might not press as hard if an employer has already done so. Therefore, financial performance measurements and targets evaluate the capacity of a certain commercial organization to accomplish its corporate mission in a given environment.
Measures and goals of financial performance are also featured to be utilized to conduct reviews of subsidiary operations, which is another crucial component. Financial statements are utilized to determine the results at a higher degree of granularity and use a more advanced level of detail. They can be presented separately for each business segment and subsidiary (Myšková & Hájek, 2019). Therefore, financial statements are necessary for various contexts within a company, and they guarantee that the most appropriate choices are taken per the metrics used to evaluate financial performance and the goals that have been determined (Kim et al., 2020). This guarantees that the organization can achieve its goals by utilizing the assets and resources at its disposal.
In conclusion, many financial indicators in an organization play an essential part in displaying how well a firm is performing and how well it can significantly meet its expectations in the context of the business world. Gross profit, net profit, current ratio, working capital, debt-equity ratio, and quick ratio are some of the leading financial performance indicators. Other notable financial performance indicators include working capital, debt-equity ratio, and quick ratio. Investors look at a company’s financial performance indicators and targets to determine whether or not they should invest in the company and whether it is healthy enough for them to invest. These metrics and targets are considered to be very important. Because they give additional insight into the firm’s future operations and profits, they are frequently viewed as a picture of the company’s economic health and work management. Additionally, they are frequently seen as a snapshot of the company’s job management. They are essential for monitoring the company’s development and determining its future prospects. Because of this, these metrics are necessary for determining whether or not the commercial company can successfully carry out its corporate objective.
With the various pieces of data comprising financial performance measurements and targets, crucial decisions within the company are developed to establish what factors influence the organization’s functioning. In addition, they are utilized to monitor the corporation’s success in relation to the numerous revenues recorded within the organization. Managers can use the information to build a plan for how to enhance their operations in a variety of contexts so that they can fulfill a certain mission inside the organization. In general, concerns regarding an organization’s finances are essential, and as such, they should be given significant consideration to guarantee the organization’s most efficient operation possible. The availability of sufficient financial resources is essential to the efficient operation of the business to satisfy customer demand. In an organization, the performance of the organization’s finances should be routinely assessed and evaluated.
Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R., & Metawa, N. (2020). An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries. Risk Management, 22(3), 192-218. Web.
Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494. Web.
Assenga, M. P., Aly, D., & Hussainey, K. (2018). The impact of board characteristics on the financial performance of Tanzanian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(6), 1089-1106. Web.
Barauskaite, G., & Streimikiene, D. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance of companies: The puzzle of concepts, definitions and assessment methods. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 278-287. Web.
Cho, S. J., Chung, C. Y., & Young, J. (2019). Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance. Sustainability, 11(2), 343. Web.
Ichsan, R., Suparmin, S., Yusuf, M., Ismal, R., & Sitompul, S. (2021). Determinant of Sharia Bank’s Financial Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 1(9)298-309. Web.
Kim, J., Kim, J., Lee, S. K., & Tang, L. R. (2020). Effects of epidemic disease outbreaks on financial performance of restaurants: Event study method approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 32-41. Web.
Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms’ financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871-1885. Web.
Levytska, S., Akimova, L., Zaiachkivska, O., Karpa, M., & Gupta, S. K. (2020). Modern analytical instruments for controlling the enterprise financial performance. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 2(33), 314-323. Web.
Myšková, R., & Hájek, P. (2019). Relationship between corporate social responsibility in corporate annual reports and financial performance of the US companies. Journal of International Studies, 12(1), 1-13. Web.
Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341. Web.
Prayag, G., Chowdhury, M., Spector, S., & Orchiston, C. (2018). Organizational resilience and financial performance. Annals of Tourism Research, 73(C), 193-196. Web.
Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 39946-39957. Web.
Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2020). Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 694-705. Web.
Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100714. Web.